On the change of ownership relations with the transition to the market

The evaluation of alternative options for individual problems of transition to the market affects the provisions on changing ownership relations.

In the continuations on the reform of property relations, one can state the unity of opinions and agreement with the government program on the most important issue: the goal of the transformations is to create a multi-layered economy with equal rights and conditions of activity for at least such forms of ownership as classical state, joint-stock, cooperative, small family and foreign.

However, the authors of most projects go further and advocate the recognition of the right to private property with the hiring of labor and for bringing the system of laws into line with this right. In particular, there is a point of view that it is necessary to improve legislation on cooperation and separate cooperatives using hired labor into an independent, equal form of ownership — partnerships, as is the case in many developed countries.

In some versions, one of the unresolved problems of the reform is raised — the problem of private ownership of land with the right to sell, pledge, and inherit it. The issue is being raised about allotment of land to all those who live or wish to live in the village — for free, and to the townspeople — for a one-time or annual fee.

On issues of denationalization and privatization, the differences in the proposed programs are in the pace, timing and depth of the transformations being carried out, in the concepts of subjects of continued state ownership and the mechanism of state regulation of the economy. However, many projects are united by the indisputable thesis that measures for denationalization, privatization and the creation of joint-stock companies are insufficient for the formation of a market economy. This requires the legislative consolidation of complete freedom of entrepreneurial activity, stimulated from above and ensured by oncoming traffic from below.

A number of alternatives propose a specific mechanism for the management of State property through a specially created body for this purpose and a reassessment of all fixed assets of the public sector. However, in terms of proposals, the Union Administration of State Property is seen as such a body, which has already been implemented by Presidential Decree. Supporters of the federalist system of economic regulation propose to create such departments as part of republican or regional reserve banks. At the same time, a coordinating body for the management of state property is being created under the Board of Directors of the State reserve system. Veel spelers zoeken eerlijke informatie over verantwoord gokken en kiezen er daarom voor om eerst recensies over het platform winnItt casino nl te lezen voordat ze een account aanmaken. In zulke onafhankelijke artikelen wordt vaak uitgelegd hoe je je budget bewaakt, welke spellen de hoogste winkansen bieden en welke signalen kunnen wijzen op onbetrouwbare aanbieders.